Legal Opinion
City of Allegan v. Vonasek
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 69, Calendar No. 36,775PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
On the former appearance of this case the judgment was reversed and new trial ordered. City of Allegan v. Vonasek, 259 Mich. 310. Another trial has been had resulting in verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.
The plaintiff, city of Allegan, sought, by these proceedings in condemnation, to take property of the several defendants for the establishment of a hydro-electric light and power plant upon the Kalamazoo river. The site of the proposed dam is called Calkins site, and is a few miles downstream from the city. The area required for pond is 1,700 acres. The city has…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commissioners of Parks & Boulevards v. MoestaMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Ingham Lumber Co. v. IngersollSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Hendershott v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Carter v. StuddardMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
- Ziegel v. Genesee County Board of Road Com'rsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re Widening of Michigan Ave.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Detroit/Wayne County Stadium Authority v. Drinkwater, Taylor & Merrill, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Consumers Power Co. v. Allegan State Bank Appeal of Nieneker TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Chamberlin v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.