Legal Opinion
Dotson v. Bravo
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 22, 2001No. 00 C 7352PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSEMOND, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is “Defendants’ Emergency Motion For Dismissal And Discovery Sanctions”. The motion is granted.
“Defendants’ Emergency Motion For Dismissal And Discovery Sanctions ” is brought pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In their motion, defendants maintain that the history of the lawsuit reveals an ongoing scheme to defraud the courts, law enforcement, and the defendants via the plaintiffs deliberate and intentional concealment of his true identity. The true identity of the plaintiff is not “Shaunte Dotson”, but…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stanley Shenker & Associates, Inc. v. World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
- Multiservice Joint Venture, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Radecki v. GlaxoSmithKlineDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Federal Trade Commission v. Asia Pacific Telecom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Grubb v. Board of Trustees of the University of IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.