Legal Opinion
Radecki v. GlaxoSmithKline
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 21, 2009No. Civil 3:06cv00849(AWT)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE AND FOR COSTS AND FEES
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The defendant has moved for a sanction in the form of dismissal with prejudice of the plaintiffs claims in this action or, in the alternative, for an award of costs and fees associated with the mistrial declared in this action and the instant motion. For the reasons set forth below, the court is dismissing the plaintiffs case with prejudice.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff D. Brian Radecki (“Radecki”) commenced employment with defendant GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”) on February 5, 2001 as a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Theodore R. Kupferman, as Receiver of Vickers, Christy & Co., Inc. v. Consolidated Research and Manufacturing Corporation, Daniel JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Castillo Marcelino v. 374 Food Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- NATS, Inc v. Radiation Shield Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Pitre v. The City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Pitre v. The City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024