Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Cox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Summary proceedings by Frank Barrett against Walter Cox and Elzada E. Cox to recover the possession of land. From a judgment for defendants, complainant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This was a summary proceeding, brought before a circuit court commissioner, to recover possession of a house and lot. The case was tried before the circuit judge, without a jury, and there was a special finding of facts, from which the following material facts ,are deduced: Prior to August 31, 1888, the lot in question had been conveyed to defendant Elzada E. Cox, by one Francis L. Nichols. Nichols and defendants had jointly improved the same, and Nichols had made his home at defendants’ for a year or two prior to that time. On August 31st, Mrs. Cox conveyed the land to Nichols, at his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Laughran v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Butler v. BertrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Huntington v. ParkhurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Huyser v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Agar v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Matter of DaggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Landsberg v. Tivoli Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Swart v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Donald v. FauldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API