Legal Opinion

Butler v. Bertrand

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1893PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Marquette. (Stone, J.) Summary proceedings to recover the possession of land. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated, in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

Complainant brought summary proceedings before a circuit court commissioner to recover possession of land. Defendant brings error to the circuit court, where said cause was tried upon appeal. The plea was “Not guilty;” that defendant owned the land in question, and that he had held undisputed possession of the same for more than 18 years before this proceeding was begun; and that the title to land cannot be tried in this form of action.

It is contended by defendant that the plea of title ousted the commissioner of jurisdiction, for the reason that title cannot be tried in summary proceedings.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Pettit v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Bennett v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Newton v. LearyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Pendill v. Marquette County Agricultural SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Jenkinson v. WinansMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Township of Jasper v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Dummer v. United States Gypsum Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. City of Grand Rapids v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API