Legal Opinion

Huntington v. Parkhurst

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

Champlin, 0. J.

This action was commenced before a justice of the peace to recover for the use and occupation of certain premises before then claimed to have been leased by the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff had judgment before the justice, and the case was appealed to the circuit court, and there, after hearing the testimony, the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff.

We quote, with a few amendments, the statement of facts taken from the supplemental brief of counsel for defendant, namely:

The plaintiff was the owner of a store building, in which was contained a stock of goods…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schuyler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Laughran v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Thomas v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. People ex rel. Kline v. RickertNew York Supreme Court · 1828

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arbenz v. Exley, Watkins & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. German State Bank v. HerronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Faraci v. FassuloMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Boucher v. St. GeorgeMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Quayle v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API