Huntington v. Parkhurst
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the Court
Champlin, 0. J.
This action was commenced before a justice of the peace to recover for the use and occupation of certain premises before then claimed to have been leased by the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff had judgment before the justice, and the case was appealed to the circuit court, and there, after hearing the testimony, the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff.
We quote, with a few amendments, the statement of facts taken from the supplemental brief of counsel for defendant, namely:
The plaintiff was the owner of a store building, in which was contained a stock of goods…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schuyler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Laughran v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Thomas v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- People ex rel. Kline v. RickertNew York Supreme Court · 1828
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Arbenz v. Exley, Watkins & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
- German State Bank v. HerronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Faraci v. FassuloMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Boucher v. St. GeorgeMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Quayle v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.