Legal Opinion

Keel v. . Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action for recovery of land and for damages.

Plaintiff alleges (1) ownership in fee of a certain tract of land in Wilson County, North Carolina, (2) unlawful possession thereof by defendant, and (3) damages. Defendant denies title of plaintiff as well as other material allegations, and by way of further answer and defense sets up various grounds — estoppel, etc.

Upon the trial below the evidence offered by the parties shows these undisputed facts:

1. Both plaintiff and defendant claim title to land in question from a common source, Robert Bailey and wife, Bettie Bailey, who held the title…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woody v. . CatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Capps v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Weeks v. Wilkins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Crawley v. . StearnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Williams v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. DIXIELAND REALTY COMPANY v. WysorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Harrell v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Matter of Estate of ChildressMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Council v. PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API