Legal Opinion

Council v. Pitt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1967No. 33PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

Petitioners, the heirs of Min Council, contend that the commissioners’ deed to Millie and Min Council did not create an estate by the entireties but vested the title in Millie Council alone, and that her subsequent deed to her husband conveyed to him a one-half undivided interest, which they acquired by inheritance from him. It is the contention of the respondents, the executrix and devisees of Millie Council, that the commissioners’ deed conveyed an estate by the entireties and that, in any event those who take through Min Council may not contend otherwise. They argue further that, as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Hood v. . MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Jones v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Capps v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Willis v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daley v. HornbakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Branstetter v. BranstetterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Meachem v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Harris v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API