Legal Opinion

In the Interest of B.A.M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlszewski, J.

¶ 1 In this appeal, B.A.M. challenges his November 26, 2001, adjudication of delinquency and the December 28, 2001, order requiring his family to pay restitution. We vacate both orders.

¶ 2 On June 29, 2001, the eleven-year-old appellant and his friend, J., also an eleven-year-old boy, went bike riding in the woods. Once there, they performed anal *894sex on one another. While thus engaged, J. somehow got chewing gum on his penis. Later that evening, while attempting to remove the gum, he was discovered by his grandmother to whom he reported that appellant forced him to participate in sexual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KoczwaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. CROSBY BY CROSBY v. SultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. ParmarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cote v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. CostaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. Wilbur W., a juvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. A.W.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. State v. Colton M.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API