Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Parmar
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 26, 1998No. 0156 M.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The Court being evenly divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
NEWMAN, J., files an Opinion in Support of Affirmance in which FLAHERTY, C.J., and CASTILLE, J., join. ZAPPALA, J., files an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which CAPPY, J., joins. NIGRO, J., files an Opinion in Support of Reversal.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
ZAPPALA, Justice.
Yashpaul Parmar (Parmar) appeals the Order of the Superi- or Court that reinstated his judgment of sentence for bribery by violating a known legal duty 1 and conspiracy to commit bribery. 2 We affirm.
FACTS
The evidence elicited at trial…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Commonwealth v. KoczwaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- United States v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MikulanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. KakhankhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. HabaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. McCalmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. Moran, ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.