Legal Opinion

State v. Cookman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1994No. 91-1524; CA A73459PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*285ROSSMAN, J.

The state appeals from an order allowing defendant’s demurrer to an indictment that charged him with using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct, dealing in depictions of sexual conduct involving a child and sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.670; ORS 163.673; ORS 163.425.1 The demurrer was based on the state’s failure to bring those charges within the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm.

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. The indictment charged that defendant committed the crimes between June 1,1986, and September 1,1986. In 1986, the limitations…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. HodgsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Circus Circus Reno, Inc. v. PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. State v. CookmanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State Ex Rel. Collins v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Long v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API