Long v. Armenakis
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, P. J.
Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his post-conviction petition on the ground that his claims were barred by the applicable 120-day statute of limitations. He contends that he was excused from filing a timely petition because his post-conviction claims could not reasonably have been raised within 120 days of his conviction. We agree with the trial court that the petition was untimely. We therefore affirm.
In July of 1992, petitioner was indicted on three counts of using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct and five counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. Two of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Eklof v. StewardOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Verduzco v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Walton v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Benitez-Chacon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.