Legal Opinion

State v. Bowman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1999No. 95-05-33541 CA A91058, (Control), A93454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

The state appeals from judgments imposing sentences on two felony convictions. Defendant was charged with two counts of first-degree robbery based on crimes committed against two victims on or about May 13, 1995. He was convicted of two counts of second-degree robbery. ORS 164.405(1)(a). At the time of sentencing, the trial court refused to impose the 70-month minimum sentences mandated by Measure 11, which was codified as ORS 137.700(2)(r) (1995). The trial court ruled that the statutes were unconstitutional as applied to defendant under Article I, section 16, of the Oregon Constitution.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cannon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CookmanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. CookmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BranamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. LavertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. MelilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. PoborCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API