Legal Opinion
Weeder v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 7, 1975No. [No. 184, September Term, 1974.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.
When Jefferson Winston Weeder came on for hearing before the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County for a determination of the question of his commitment to Patuxent Institution (Patuxent) as a defective delinquent, that court (McCullough, J.) granted Weeder’s motion to strike the testimony of psychologist Paul Edwards, the State’s only witness; dismissed the defective delinquency proceeding, and remanded Weeder to the custody of the Division of Correction.
The State appealed to the Court of Special Appeals which reversed the trial court and remanded the case for a determination of defective…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNeil v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murel v. Baltimore City Criminal CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Director, Patuxent Institution v. CashCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- State v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Davis v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Arbaugh v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Moss v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Wentworth v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.