Legal Opinion
Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 17, 1966No. [No. 520, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
Samuel Daniels, an appellee and cross-appellant, was found to be a defective delinquent in 1959 by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County pursuant to the provisions of the Maryland Defective Delinquent Act, Code (1964 Supp.), Art. 31B (the Act), and was remanded to Patuxent Institution, the place of confinement, and treatment and rehabilitation if possible, established by the Act for those judicially determined to be de fective delinquents. In 1964 he sought a redetermination of his status in the same trial court, as permitted by the Act, a jury again decided that he was a defective…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Murel v. Baltimore City Criminal CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Tippett v. MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Director, Patuxent Institution v. CashCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Potomac Sand & Gravel Co. v. GovernorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.