Legal Opinion

Arbaugh v. Director, Patuxent Institution

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 28, 1975No. 1036, September Term, 1974PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

Rocky Floyd Arbaugh, appellant, was found by a jury in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, to be a defective delinquent within the meaning of Md. Ann. Code art. 31B, § 5. From that determination Arbaugh sought leave to appeal to this Court, which leave was granted on February 3, 1975, and the case was transferred to the regular appeal docket.

In this Court the appellant strenuously argues that:

“References to charges or [sic] homicide or murder pending against the Appellant at the time of his defective delinquent hearing, but not yet determined by a Court of law are prejudicial to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Smith v. LefloreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Chenault v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Wentworth v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API