Legal Opinion
Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 7, 1975No. [No. 115, September Term, 1974.]PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Digges, Levine and Eldridge, JJ., dissent and Eldridge, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which Digges and Levine, JJ., concur at page 314 infra.
Appellants, Madison Fulwood (Fulwood) and Melvin Williams (Williams), were hAd in civil contempt of court by a Baltimore City trial judge when they refused to cooperate with the staff of Patuxent Institution in mental examinations to determine whether they were “defective delinquents” within the meaning of Maryland Code (1957) Art. 31B, § 5. In order that we might address ourselves to the propriety of the trial court’s action in holding them in…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Curran v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.