Director, Patuxent Institution v. Cash
Court of Appeals of Maryland
September Term, 1972.]
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
Both appeals, Director, Patuxent Institution v. Clifton Cash et al, No. 287, September Term, 1972, and Gerald Booker v. State of Maryland ex rel. Board of Patuxent Institution, No. 318, September Term, 1972, present the same basic question of whether the reporting provision of Maryland Code (1957, 1971 Repl. Vol.) Art. 31B, § 7(a), as amended by Chapter 491 of the Laws of Maryland of 1971, for persons awaiting examination and evaluation at the Patuxent Institution is mandatory or directory. We have decided to consider both cases together in this opinion. There are, however, additional…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- McNeil v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murel v. Baltimore City Criminal CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Resetar v. State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. ShraderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.