Beveridge v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.
Plaintiff brought a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) unlawfully rescinded his parole release date. Defendant filed a return, and plaintiff filed a replication. With accompanying evidence, defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff had failed to state or establish a claim for habeas relief. Plaintiff responded, also with evidence. Following a hearing at which plaintiff appeared with his attorneys, the trial court dismissed plaintiffs writ with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals. We review to determine whether the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- SAIF Corp. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hamel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Davis v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Gholston v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Porter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Griffin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.