Legal Opinion

Beveridge v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 1998No. 97-05-28829M; CA A99719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Plaintiff brought a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) unlawfully rescinded his parole release date. Defendant filed a return, and plaintiff filed a replication. With accompanying evidence, defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff had failed to state or establish a claim for habeas relief. Plaintiff responded, also with evidence. Following a hearing at which plaintiff appeared with his attorneys, the trial court dismissed plaintiffs writ with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals. We review to determine whether the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. SAIF Corp. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hamel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Davis v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Gholston v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Porter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Griffin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API