Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 24, 1990No. 87-12543, 87-15218; CA A48762PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Claimant has moved to dismiss SAIF’s petition for judicial review as untimely. She argues that SAIF was required and failed to file an amended petition for judicial review. We deny claimant’s motion but dismiss on our own motion, because there is no final order from which SAIF can seek review.

On May 18,1988, the Workers’ Compensation Board issued an order reversing the referee and determining that claimant’s condition was compensable. On June 9,1989, SAIF filed with the Board a “REQUEST FOR ABATEMENT AND RECONSIDERATION.” On June 16,1988, SAIF filed a petition for judicial review. On June…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Fischer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Career Service Review Board v. Utah Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Boydston v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Beveridge v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Lyday v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Haskell Corp. v. FilippiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API