Legal Opinion
Gholston v. Palmateer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 24, 2002No. 99C-19013; A109189PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. The principal issue is whether the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) has authority to require an inmate to undergo a psychological evaluation before being released on parole. We conclude that it does and affirm.
The relevant facts are uncontested. In 1977, the legislature enacted ORS 144.223(1), which provides:
“The State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision may require any prisoner being considered for parole to be examined by a psychiatrist or psychologist before being released on parole.”
In 1985,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Beveridge v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Turner v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lovelace v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Shelby v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007