Legal Opinion

Gholston v. Palmateer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 24, 2002No. 99C-19013; A109189PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. The principal issue is whether the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) has authority to require an inmate to undergo a psychological evaluation before being released on parole. We conclude that it does and affirm.

The relevant facts are uncontested. In 1977, the legislature enacted ORS 144.223(1), which provides:

“The State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision may require any prisoner being considered for parole to be examined by a psychiatrist or psychologist before being released on parole.”

In 1985,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beveridge v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Turner v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovelace v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Shelby v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API