Legal Opinion
Rogers v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 20, 2010No. Nos. 07-273L, 07-426L, 08-198L, 10-187L, 10-200LPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Defendant moves the Court to enter judgment on the pleadings or in the alternative, *514to grant Defendant partial summary judgment with respect to the takings claims of Plaintiffs, William Breda, Jr., and Angelyn P. Breda (the “Bredas”), on the ground that the Bredas lack standing. Because the Bredas did not own property abutting or underlying the railroad corridor at the time of the taking and were not authorized to file suit on behalf of their homeowners’ association, they have not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- E & E Enterprises Global, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Ground Improvement Techniques, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Julio A. Ramos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Bio-Medical Applications of Aquadilla, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Devine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.