Legal Opinion
Julio A. Ramos v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 1, 2013No. 12-859CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Takings; 28 U.S.C. § 2501 (2006); RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); Untimely Claim; Confiscation of Property at Time of Criminal Arrest Not a Taking for Public Use; Res Judicata; Pro Se.
OPINION
Bush, Judge.
The court has before it defendant’s motion to dismiss this suit for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant’s motion has been fully briefed. 1 For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion, filed pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), is granted.
BACKGROUND 2
Mr. Ramos…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- McCune v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014