Bio-Medical Applications of Aquadilla, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Underpayment Claim; Money-Mandating Regulation; 38 C.F.R. § 17.56 (2008); RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6).
OPINION
BUSH, Senior Judge.
The court has before it defendant’s motion to dismiss this suit, which was brought pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Defendant’s motion was filed May 5, 2014 and has been fully briefed, including sur-replies and extensive appendices. Oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor deemed necessary by the court. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND 1
This…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 28 Trans, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026