Legal Opinion

Bio-Medical Applications of Aquadilla, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 19, 2014No. 14-187CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Underpayment Claim; Money-Mandating Regulation; 38 C.F.R. § 17.56 (2008); RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6).

OPINION

BUSH, Senior Judge.

The court has before it defendant’s motion to dismiss this suit, which was brought pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Defendant’s motion was filed May 5, 2014 and has been fully briefed, including sur-replies and extensive appendices. Oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor deemed necessary by the court. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is denied.

BACKGROUND 1

This…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 28 Trans, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API