Legal Opinion

Roxoline Petroleum Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1926No. 15879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAX, O.

This suit was commenced by judgment creditors of the J. 0. & O. Drilling & Leasing Company, a corporation, against E. Talbert and Lester B. Gum, to subject an undivided one-half interest in and to 17% acres of land in Okmulgee county, and one-half of the oil produced therefrom, to the satisfaction of plaintiffs’ judgment against the J. G. & O. Drilling & Leasing Company, upon the ground that the judgment debtor was insolvent and had assigned an undivided one-half interest to the defendant E. Talbert for the purpose of defrauding its creditors. No question, is argued here as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Limerick v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. Davidson v. GaskillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Snyder v. NossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Clark v. Board of Com'rs of Osage CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roxoline Petroleum Co. v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Craig v. Roxoline Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Johnnie L. Phelps v. Fina Oil and Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Craig v. Roxoline Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Johnnie L. Phelps v. Fina Oil & Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API