Roxoline Petroleum Co. v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAX, O.
This suit was commenced by judgment creditors of the J. 0. & O. Drilling & Leasing Company, a corporation, against E. Talbert and Lester B. Gum, to subject an undivided one-half interest in and to 17% acres of land in Okmulgee county, and one-half of the oil produced therefrom, to the satisfaction of plaintiffs’ judgment against the J. G. & O. Drilling & Leasing Company, upon the ground that the judgment debtor was insolvent and had assigned an undivided one-half interest to the defendant E. Talbert for the purpose of defrauding its creditors. No question, is argued here as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Limerick v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Davidson v. GaskillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Snyder v. NossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Clark v. Board of Com'rs of Osage CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roxoline Petroleum Co. v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Craig v. Roxoline Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Johnnie L. Phelps v. Fina Oil and Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Craig v. Roxoline Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Johnnie L. Phelps v. Fina Oil & Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993