Legal Opinion
Roxoline Petroleum Co. v. Craig
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 21, 1931No. 19557PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
M. E. Craig and O. O. Craig procured a general judgment against the J. G. & 0. Drilling & Leasing Company and caused a general execution to be issued thereon to the sheriff of Okmulgee county commanding him to satisfy the amount of the judgment from the goods, chattels, lands,, or tenements of the J. G. & O. Drilling & Leasing Company. The sheriff levied the execution on an undivided one-half interest in the land involved in this action, caused the land to be appraised, advertised the same for sale and sold the same to M. E. Craig and C. 0. Craig. The sale .was confirmed and he executed and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Ziska v. AveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Taylor v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Hurst v. HannahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crockett v. RootSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Crain v. Farmers United Cooperative PoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Allen v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Craig v. Roxoline Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Mayfield v. L. v. French Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.