Craig v. Roxoline Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion
Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing.
OSBORN, J.
Prom the petition for rehearing and briefs in support thereof by attorneys for defendant in error, it appears that defendant in error and its counsel are somewhat confused as to the effect of Ihe prior opinions of this court relating to the subject-matter in controversy, which opinions are referred to in the original opinion in this cause. For the sake of clarity and in order to end this litigation, which has had the attention of this court in three eases, we have concluded to elaborate our former opinion.
By the opinion in the case of Roxoline…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oklahoma Moline Plow Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Roxoline Petroleum Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Sartin v. HughenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932