Legal Opinion
Johnnie L. Phelps v. Fina Oil and Chemical Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 26, 1991No. 91-6196PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Johnnie L. Phelps appeals from a district court judgment granting defendant-appellee Fina Oil & Chemical Company’s motion for summary judgment and denying Phelps’ motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The issue is whether the district court correctly concluded that Phelps failed to offer sufficient evidence in support of his creditor’s bill action against Fina. We reverse and remand.
Phelps, David Brunson, and Warren Montgomery formed Paragon Energy, Ltd., to engage in the oil business. Paragon’s main asset…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Osgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Rucks-Brandt Construction Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Black v. BurdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Miller Co. v. MeloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- United States v. Bobby Joe Chapman, A/K/A B.J. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Larry O. Hulsey, an Individual Larry O. Hulsey & Co., a Texas Corporation, Defendants-Third Party v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago, a National Banking Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HulseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Johnnie L. Phelps v. Fina Oil & Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States of America, Plaintiff/counter-Defendant/appellee v. David J. Thomas, Defendant/counter-Claimant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993