Legal Opinion

Frankston v. Ferme

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 12, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

Plaintiff Michael Frankston brought this suit to recover for increased construction costs that allegedly resulted when the defendants stopped performance of their work. The defendant, Cogefit, Ltd., counterclaimed for its lost profits. After a jury-waived trial, judgment was entered on August 6, 2003 for defendant Cogefit on the plaintiffs complaint and on its counterclaim.2 On August 23, 2003, the court allowed the defendant’s motion to amend the judgment to correct interest. A timely Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C, appeal was then filed by the plaintiff. On March 8, 2007, over 42…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Brown v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Niles v. Boston Rent Control AdministratorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  4. Charles River Park, Inc. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  5. Points East, Inc. v. City CouncilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lashus v. SlaterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  2. Citibank (South Dakota) NA v. SurabianMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
  3. Donovan v. MahoneyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. OkamuraMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API