Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Mahoney

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 12, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Attorney John P. Donovan (“Donovan”), filed this pro se appeal of a directed verdict entered against him following an October 9,2008 jury-waived trial in the Stoughton Division of the District Court Department. There was no error.

This action by Donovan arose out of his fee dispute with the defendant, Attorney Brian F. Mahoney (“Mahoney”). In 2003, the parties executed a written “Referral Fee Agreement” that provided for Donovan’s referral of personal injury and workers’ compensation cases to Mahoney, and for Mahoney’s payment to Donovan of one-third of the attorney’s fee…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sound Techniques, Inc. v. HoffmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Devito v. Cellular Mobile Communications, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Kesslen Shoe Co. v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Lashus v. SlaterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  5. 402 Rindge Corp. v. Ming TsaoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flores v. CastaldiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
  2. Jefferson at Admiral Hill Ltd. Partnership v. PressmanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014
  3. Segal v. JamronMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API