Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Okamura

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 28, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion to permit the late filing of an “appeal on the record of proceedings,” pursuant to District/Municipal Courts Rules for Appellate Division Appeal (“R. A. D. A.”), Rule 8C(b), where the party seeldng appellate review had filed a notice of appeal within the time provided by the rules. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm the order of the trial court.

This is a postforeclosure summary process action where the plaintiff-appellee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A (‘Wells Fargo”), sought possession of property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greenleaf v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Friedman v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Piedra v. Mercy Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  4. Troy Industries, Inc. v. Samson Manufacturing Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. Lashus v. SlaterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davagian v. PappasMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014
  2. Demello v. Cape Cod Spas & Pools, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API