Spray Products Corp. v. Strouse, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Spray Products Corporation, has filed the instant motion under Rule 37, 28 U.S.C.A. to compel the defendant, A. Frank Strouse, to produce certain documents specified in a certain item of the subpoena duces tecum issued February 27, 1961, and to answer certain questions put to him at the oral deposition on March 10, 1961. Defendants oppose plaintiff’s motion on the ground that the information sought by plaintiff constitutes either privileged communications between client and attorney or relates to *245•the matter of damages and profits which should be deferred until…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Westinghouse Electric Corp. Uranium Contracts LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- American Optical Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1972
- Boyd v. GullettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Cleo Wrap Corp. v. Elsner Engineering Works, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Giordani v. HoffmannDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.