Cleo Wrap Corp. v. Elsner Engineering Works, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HERMAN, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action in which both parties have filed motions to compel discovery pursuant to Rule 37 *388of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Both plaintiff and defendant have refused on various grounds to answer several interrogatories propounded by the opposing party. In addition, the plaintiff, Cleo Wrap Corporation, has declined to honor defendant’s requests for the production of documents for inspection and copying under Rule 34.
Both parties seek attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in the litigation of their respective motions to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meese v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Trabon Engineering Co. v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Bass v. Gulf Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1969
- Spray Products Corp. v. Strouse, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Centurion Industries, Inc. v. Warren SteurerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Flour Mills of America, Inc. v. PaceDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Nelco Corp. v. Slater Electric Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.