Legal Opinion

Stocklassa v. Kinnamon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 1928No. 17889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, C.

S. D. Kinnamon, as plaintiff, filed this action in the district court of Seminole county against J. J. Stocklassa and Anna Stocklassa to cancel a mineral reservation in a warranty deed to certain lands located in Seminole county, wherein defendants were grantors and plaintiff was grantee. Plaintiff alleged that, on the 14th day of October, 1919, he entered into a written agreement with the defendants, whereby defendants agreed to sell to plaintiff a farm consisting of 200 acres for the sum of $20,-000. The written agreement further provided that plaintiff should have until January…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Warner v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. RenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Moschos v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Webb v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flowers v. StanleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Gates v. Kansas Farmers' Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Holland v. MoretonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API