Legal Opinion

Hornung v. Sedgwick

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1913No. S.F. No. 6029PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Edward C. Harrison, and Maurice E. Harrison, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment that he.take nothing and that he has no interest in the real property described in his complaint, given in an action brought by him as administrator to recover possession of said property and to obtain a decree quieting the title of his intestate and her estate to said property as against defendants.

The appeal is on the judgment-roll alone. The findings of the trial court fully present the facts upon which the respective claims of the parties are based.

On May 13, 1909, plaintiff’s intestate, Mrs. Laura Hornung, who it appears in the complaint was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Estate of ReithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Sanford v. SanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manning v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re Estate of CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. MacKenzie v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API