Legal Opinion

MacKenzie v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1918No. Civ. No. 2604PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of securing a decree declaring void a trust created by William Mackenzie, deceased. Defendant Trust & Savings Bank was named as the trustee in the instrument of trust executed by said Mackenzie. It was also administrator of his estate. From the judgment denying the plaintiff the relief sought, this appeal was taken.

The facts were agreed upon and presented to the trial judge by written stipulation. It appears that in 1904 William Mackenzie, being the owner of a large amount of property, determined that he would then distribute to his wife and children…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Estate of ReithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Sanford v. SanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hornung v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parks v. LefeberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Davenport v. Davenport FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Boyer v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API