Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Allred

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1934No. 1785—6686PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRITZ, Commissioner.

This is an original mandamus proceeding instituted by the city of Houston, Tex., as relator, against Hon. James V. Allred, Attorney General of Texas, as respondent, to compel him to approve the transcript relating to the issuance of $2,502,000 worth of city of Houston waterworks revenue bonds. James W. and Henry M. Rockwell, individually and as independent executors of the J. M. Rockwell estate, and J. H. Pittman and E. D. Holt are made parties as co-respondents. The presence herein of the co-respondents will be explained later.

Relator is a home rule city duly incorporated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Fort Worth v. BobbittTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of Dayton v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. City of Fort Worth v. BobbittTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Jackson v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Lower Colorado River Authority v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Texas Turnpike Authority v. ShepperdTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hidalgo County Water Improvement District No. 2 v. BlalockTexas Supreme Court · 1957

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API