City of Dayton v. Allred
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge CRITZ
delivered the opinion of the Commission, Section A.
This is an original mandamus proceeding instituted by the City of Dayton et a!., hereinafter called Relators, against the Honorable James Y. Allred, Attorney General of Texas, hereinafter called Respondent, to compel his approval of certain bonds of such city in the sum of $22,500.00 designated as “city OF DAYTON SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS.” All fact questions are admitted; only law questions being involved.
It appears from this record that on January 4, 1934, the City Council of the City of Dayton, Texas, passed an ordinance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graves v. HornTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- McNeal v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Fort Worth v. BobbittTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Fort Worth v. BobbittTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Wiener v. ZweibTexas Supreme Court · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Grimes County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Texas Municipal Power AgencyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Lower Colorado River Authority v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Prize Energy Resources, L.P. v. Cliff Hoskins, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.