Legal Opinion

Texas Turnpike Authority v. Shepperd

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1955No. A-5157PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Culver

In this original proceeding Texas Turnpike Authority, relator, here seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Attorney General to approve the Dallas-Fort Worth Turnpike Revenue Bonds issued by relator in the sum of $58,500,000, under the provisions of Vernon’s Ann. Stat., Art. 6674v, Turnpike Projects.

The Attorney General refuses approval for the following reasons:

“1. The powers granted to the Texas Turnpike Authority are so broad, unlimited and undefined thát the result is an unlawful delegation by the Legislature of its authority in violation of Section I of Article II and Section I of Article…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Thomas v. Abernathy County Line Independent School Dist.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. ParsonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Lively v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Lower Colorado River Authority v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. LewellenTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. City of Irving v. Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. State v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API