Hidalgo County Water Improvement District No. 2 v. Blalock
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman
By this original proceeding relators seek a writ of mandamus directing and requiring Honorable W. R. Blalock, Judge of the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, to proceed to the trial of Cause No. B-20,576 on the docket of that court. The sole question involved is whether Judge Blalock is disqualified to try the case under Article V, Section 11, of our State Constitution, more specifically under that provision thereof reading as follows: “No judge shall sit in any case wherein he may be interested, * * It is not claimed that he is disqualified on any other ground.
This court has jurisdiction…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. Ferguson KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Oak Cliff v. State Ex Rel. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- City of Houston v. AllredTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
- City of Houston v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Kissam v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Cameron v. GreenhillTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Alamo Title Company v. San Antonio Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1965
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.