Legal Opinion

Telephone Management Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 29, 1998No. 5:98-cv-01097PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GWIN, District Judge.

On November 16, 1998, Defendant Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (“Goodyear”) filed a motion for summary judgment [Doc. 31]. For the reasons that follow, this Court grants Goodyear’s motion for summary judgment.

This action arises from a written telephone service consulting contract between Plaintiff Telephone Management Corporation (“TMC”) and Defendant Goodyear. Plaintiff TMC sues Goodyear for breach of contract, breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, quantum meruit, misrepresentation, and misappropriation of trade secrets.

In its…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White v. Smith & Wesson Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
  2. Andersons, Inc. v. Consol, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
  3. Reed v. WehrmannDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  4. Geier Bros. Farms v. Furst-McNess Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
  5. First Star Logistics, LLC v. BernardDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API