Legal Opinion

Geier Bros. Farms v. Furst-McNess Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 22, 2002No. 3:00CV7599PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 44 & 46) and Defendants’ motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 90). Jurisdiction in this Court is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the following reasons, the motions for summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part, and the motion for reconsideration will be denied.

Background

Plaintiff Geier Brothers Farms (“Geier Brothers”) is a multi-commodity farming operation and general partnership located in Mercer County, Ohio. 1 Although Geier Brothers…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKinney v. Bayer Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  2. Charleston Marine Containers Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API