Elder v. Kutner
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This action was brought in the superior court of the county of Fresno, to recover damages against the respondents, as sureties upon an undertaking in an attachment suit against the plaintiff and appellant here, which attachment suit was dismissed.
The complaint contains two counts. In the first, plaintiff, after the usual averments in reference to the suing out and levy of the attachment upon his land at Fresno, as a predicate for the recovery of damages, alleges as follows, in paragraph 9:—
“That between the twenty-first day of January, 1891, *492and the i wenty-seventh day of August,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- State ex rel. Roe v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
- Heath v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
- Ah Thaie v. Quan WanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Willson v. McEvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fraser v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Nelson v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Dorr Cattle Co. v. Des Moines National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Reachi v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Schwartz v. California Claim Service, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1942
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.