Legal Opinion
Mueller v. MacBan
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 12, 1976No. Civ. 34185PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
This is an appeal by petitioner from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate under section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The judgment sustained a determination made pursuant to section 7616 of the Financial Code 1 by respondent. The Savings and Loan Commissioner of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as “Commissioner”) that petitioner could not bring a derivative action on behalf of Fidelity Financial Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Fidelity Financial”), and Fidelity Savings and Loan Association (hereinafter referred to as…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- David Welch Co. v. Erskine & TulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Knight v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Gaillard v. Natomas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.