Legal Opinion
Seppmann v. Roden
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 12, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2538PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal in, an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellees, John J. Roden,. Paul W. Quinn, and David C. Roden.
The alleged invention relates to an automobile brake-testing device.
Count 3 is illustrative of the five counts-involved in the issue. It reads:
“3. A brake-testing device adapted for application to a vehicle wheel and comprising a primary lever, a secondary lever pivoted to the intermediate portion of said primary lever,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kendall v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Miller v. HaymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Vanore v. ImprotaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. HaymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Brydle v. HonigbaumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Stresau v. IpsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Brydle v. HonigbaumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931