Legal Opinion

Stresau v. Ipsen

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 10, 1935No. Patent Appeal 3484PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This appeal involves an interference proceeding originating in the United States. Patent Office between a patent, No. 1,771,-961, issued to Ipsen July 29, 1930, upon an application, serial No. 312,760, filed October 16, 1928, and an application, serial No. 339,200, filed by Stresau February 11, 1929.

The subject-matter is embraced in four counts comprising four method claims copied into the Stresau application from the Ipsen patent for the purpose of inter ference. The issues involved do not necessitate an analysis of the counts, all of which relate to a method of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kendall v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. Kirby v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Palmer v. DudzikCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Davis R. Dewey, II v. Elliott J. LawtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Feldmeier v. MojonnierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  5. Tomecek v. StimpsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API