Legal Opinion

Meheula v. Hausten

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1926No. 1626PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LINDSAY, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of a circuit judge, at chambers, in equity, ordering the reformation of a deed executed by complainant conveying to the respondents a certain piece of land at Kaimuki, in the City of Honolulu.

But two questions are presented by the appeal, first, whether under the evidence the circuit judge properly decreed that the deed in question should be reformed; and, second, whether the complainant is entitled to any of the proceeds of a fire insurance policy taken out by the respondents on a house on the premises which was destroyed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roby v. ColehourIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Beach v. WiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Welsh v. London Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Mayrand v. MayrandIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Graham v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1851

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Small v. BadenhopHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Furtado v. RezentsHawaii Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Kaiser v. First Hawaiian BankDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1997
  5. Chun Chew Pang v. Chun Chew KeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API