Legal Opinion

Mid-Pacific Dress Manufacturing Co. v. Cadinha

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1935No. 2122PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is before us upon writ of error to review a decree of a judge of the first circuit court in equity setting aside a sale and granting other relief to the petitioners. In their bill of complaint petitioners allege in effect and among other things that under date of December 14, 1929, the New York Dress Company, Limited, an Hawaiian corporation, made an assignment of all of its property for the benefit of its creditors to the defendant L. V. Cadinha, for the uses and purposes and with the powers in said assignee specifically set forth in the instrument of assignment, a copy of which is…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Local 167, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. City of Lincoln v. MorrisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Cuyler v. MorelandNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  4. Smith v. LaameaHawaii Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Zen v. Koon ChanHawaii Supreme Court · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Glover v. FongHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Shoemaker v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Chun v. ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hong v. KongHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API