Legal Opinion
Igo v. Chernin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 26, 1995No. C5-95-1195PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Alex Chernin appeals, arguing that service of process requirements were not fulfilled. We conclude that he waived the issue, and we affirm.
FACTS
On December 5, 1994, Colleen Igo filed an affidavit and petition for a harassment restraining order against Chernin. A temporary order was granted, and a hearing was scheduled for December 14, 1994. Igo failed to appear, and the court dismissed the petition. On December 14, a deputy sheriff filed a certificate of unserved process, stating that he had been to Ghernin’s residence twice and had left a message on his telephone…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Amdahl v. Stonewall Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Mississippi Valley Development Corp. v. Colonial Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Peterson v. EishenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Ball v. BarberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Galbreath v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999