Legal Opinion
Brophy v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 5, 1996No. Civil Action 95-7388PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Before me is defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs Donald Brophy and Joan Brophy (“the Brophys”) allege that the defendant Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation (“Chase Manhattan”) and its agent, defendant William Bowen (“Bowen”), violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C.A. § 2601 et seq., the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C.A. § 1601 et seq., the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, 73 P.S. § 201-1 et seq., and Pennsylvania tort law by misrepresenting the terms and charges…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Melvin McGowan v. King, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Edwin Grant and Lauretta Grant Johnson v. Imperial Motors, Nathaniel Johnson v. Imperial Motors, Johnnie Mae Gordon v. Backus Cadillac-Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Smith v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Balko v. Carnegie Financial Group Inc. (In Re Balko)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- McNinch v. Mortgage America, Inc. (In Re McNinch)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Sarsfield v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Nelson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Kamara v. Columbia Home Loans, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.